Content: Legally, what’s fair game?
Monday, September 15th, 2008In the age of user-generated and user-submitted content, how do you determine what’s legally protected and what’s OK to share or re-purpose?
Although this question might not be top-of-mind when you’re starting a new project, it’s an important consideration in today’s content! content! content! marketing scene. Since legal isn’t really my thing, I sought out the expertise of someone who works in marketing at a local law firm. And since blogging isn’t really her thing, here’s a quick summary of the conversation.
The number one thing I took away from our discussion is that not considering legal implications for your online content can be very risky.
What you decide to protect and what you decide to share are critical factors in protecting and promoting your brand. How do you decide where to draw the line? Consider a proactive approach and attempt to answer these questions in order to determine the level of brand access to give to the user:
- Ideally, what role does the user play?
- What are the essential tools the user needs in order to participate?
- How active is the user currently with the brand?
- What is the motivation of the user in this initiative? What gets the user interested?
- What is the expectation of the user? What does the user hope to accomplish by participating?
At the most simplistic level, determining what to legally protect and what to share starts with audience analysis. As user-generated content becomes more effective in marketing initiatives, what to share / what to protect will become an essential part of brand strategy.
Is it more exciting to spend more time on how to get and use user-generated content? If you ask this marketer, the answer is yes. However, if you don’t devote time to building a strategy around what content is protected, you may find that your users will make that decision for you. Eek.
